UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Subhash Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the incident and fir lodged. (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. conviction analysis led to questions on witness credibility and time of crime. (Para 3) |
| 3. grounds of appeal by the appellants. (Para 4) |
| 4. witness testimonies and contradictions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court's assessment of evidence and motives. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. the final ruling hinged on the acceptance of murder evidence while discarding lesser charges. (Para 60) |
| 7. outcome of the appeal and conviction status. (Para 62 , 63) |
JUDGMENT
Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellants, Ms. Anupriya Jaiswal, learned AGA, Sri Devanshu Pratap Singh Brief Holder for the State and perused the record.
2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction and sentencing dated 19.05.2000 passed by the Special Judge (PC Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Lucknow in ST No. 655 of 1997 alongwith ST No.655A of 1997 (State v. Dharmesh and others), arising out of Case Crime No.80 of 1997, Police Station Banthra, District Lucknow by which the learned trial Judge convicted all the three accused persons under Section
Maqbool v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Mritunjoy Biswas v. Pranab alias Kuti Biswas
Rahul Mishra v. State of Uttarakhand
Sheo Shankar Singh v. State of Jharkhand
Shyamal Ghosh v. State of West Bengal
State of Karnataka v. Suvarnamma
State of Punjab v. Hakam Singh
Sucha Singh v. State of Punjab
Sudeep Kumar Singh v. State of West Bengal
Vinod Kumar v. State of Punjab
Bable v. State of Chhattisgarh
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad v. State of Maharashtra
Dhanaj Singh v. State of Punjab
Janrail Singh v. State of Punjab
Khem Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The evidentiary value of hostile witnesses can support the prosecution case if found credible, notwithstanding the non-recovery of weapons or procedural lapses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal provisions related to culpable homicide and murder, and the consideration of the reformative theory of punishment in sente....
The appellate court emphasized that eyewitness accounts must be given due weight, and mere flaws in investigation do not automatically discount credible testimonies in murder trials.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.