SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 535

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Vikash Kumar @ Vikas Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s P.K. Shahi, AG, Nadeem Seraj, GP-5, Shahbaj Alam, AC to GP-5.
For the Respondent: None.

K. Vinod Chandran, CJ.—The appeal is by the State against the judgment of the learned Single Judge which set aside the order of dismissal passed by the appointing authority; confirmed by the appellate and revisional authority

2. We heard the learned Advocate General for the State.

3. The respondent, who was the writ petitioner was a Constable who was proceeded against on allegations of misconduct, an enquiry conducted and allegedly based on the evidence adduced, dismissed from service. The allegation of misconduct was that he celebrated a birthday party with a Probationer Lady Constable.

4. The learned Single Judge found that there was absolutely no valid evidence led at the enquiry conducted. Two officers of the police force who conducted the preliminary enquiry were examined before the Enquiry Officer. They merely stated that statements taken from eye witnesses, who saw the petitioner with the lady probationer, indicated that they were at a party and to avoid detection; the petitioner together with the probationer ran away and jumped over the boundary wall of the party venue. The learned Single Judge found that since there was no valid evidence led at the enquiry, the order of dismi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top