SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Vijay Malhan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner who was earlier posted as the Assistant General Manager, Regional Inspectorate at Chandigarh, challenging the order dated 23rd January 2003 directing the removal of Petitioner from services of Oriental Bank of Commerce (hereinafter referred to as "Respondent Bank") passed by the Disciplinary Authority and upheld by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 28th February 2003.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The brief facts for the disposal of the instant writ petition are that the Petitioner was appointed as a Branch Manager in the Respondent Bank in the year 1975. On the pretext of an anonymous complaint, the Petitioner was initially issued a show cause letter dated 15th March 1996 by the Respondent Bank on four charges and was asked for his explanation. The Petitioner sent his comments on the charges levelled against him, pointing out the baselessness thereof vide communication dated 25th March 1996 and 8th April 1996.

3. Upon receipt of explanation from the Petitioner, the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Respondent Bank addressed a letter dated 22n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top