Back
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, JITENDRA KUMAR
Kedar Singh S/o- Late Nageshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jitendra Kumar, J.
The present appeals have been preferred against the order of conviction and sentence dated 07.04.2018 and 09.04.2018 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Siwan in Session Trial No. 411 of 2016, arising out of Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 212 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 5022 of 2015, whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27 read with Section 35 of the Arms Act, and all three appellants are sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. and to undergo imprisonment for three years and pay fine of Rs.500/- for offence punishable under Section 27 read with Section 35 of Arms Act, with default clause. Both the sentences are directed to run concurrently.
2. The FIR bearing Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 212 of 2015 was registered on 14.11.2015 at 08.15 O’clock for offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act against three accused Persons who are appellants herein on the fardbeyan of
The court affirmed that eyewitness testimony from related witnesses can be credible, and minor discrepancies do not undermine the prosecution's case if the core facts are established beyond reasonabl....
Point of law: Every person who witnesses a murder reacts in his own way. Some are stunned, become speechless and stand rooted to the spot. Some become hysteric and start wailing. Some start shouting ....
The significance of corroborative eyewitness testimony in criminal cases, with minor discrepancies not undermining evidence credibility, unless they affect core facts established beyond reasonable do....
The court affirmed that the prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and testimonies of interested witnesses can be credible if corroborated by medical evidence.
Convictions can be based on a sole eyewitness's testimony if credible; however, significant contradictions can undermine the prosecution's case, particularly regarding common intention under Section ....
Mere failure of the prosecution in producing reports from the Forensic Science Laboratory relating to the weapon of offence and the blood-stained earth and clothes would not derogate from the veracit....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
