SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 836

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Ashish Bharti @ Rocky Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Bijpuria.
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12.

Mohit Kumar Shah, J.—The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 18.06.2018 issued by the Circle Officer, Tarapur, Munger i.e. the respondent no. 2, in connection with Encroachment Case No. 10 of 2018-19, by which the petitioner has been informed that he has encroached over Plot No. 126 admeasuring 37’ x 72’, hence he should remove the encroachment by 03.07.2018.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the land appertaining to Khata No. 87, Plot No. 126, Mauza-Rajguru, Tarapur, District-Munger was acquired by the grandfather of the petitioner by a registered sale deed dated 21.07.1973, executed by one Kaushandra Prasad for a piece of land admeasuring 7 decimal. Thereafter, Jamabandi bearing Jamabandi No. 453 was created in favor of the grandfather of the petitioner, namely, Baikunth Jha and since then rent is being paid to the State of Bihar. It is further submitted that without considering the aforesaid aspect, the respondent no. 2, vide the aforesaid notice dated 18.06.2018, has directed the petitioner to remove the encroachment in question and moreover, no encroachment proceeding has been actually initiated, hence the afore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top