IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
CWJC No.9750 of 2015
(24.10.2024)
Dr. Satya Prakash ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents
Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 – Section 35 – Adjustment/shifting of Post – Petitioner was appointed by the Governing Body of the Railway College on a temporary post as lecturer in Physics and started discharging his duties – Education Department sanctioned and approved altogether twenty five posts of Lecturers in different subjects including two posts in the subject of Physics without any financial liability – Petitioner was absorbed against the second post (vitta rahit post) – Post of the petitioner was sanctioned by the State Government and in continuation of the appointment of the petitioner he was absorbed in regular service by the order – Section 35 of the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 is not applicable in the facts of the present case – This provision basically is to the effect that no post for appointment shall be created without prior sanction of the State Government; nor the pay, allowances attached to any post or sanctioned strength shall be increased without any prior approval of the State Government and is not applicable to the controversy in hand – Petitioner has rightly been shifted from the second unaided post to the first aided post after retirement of the incumbent of the first post as the petitioner was the senior most lecturer in Physics working in the Railway College at the relevant point of time – The blanket denial of approval of shifting by the State respondent is completely arbitrary and unreasonable as the respondent / State failed to support its decision by cogent reasons – If the petitioner is adjusted / shifted against the 1st sanctioned post of Lecturer in Physics, the same would not create any financial liability upon the State Government – Shifting of the petitioner from second post to first post from unaided post to deficit grant post after retirement of the incumbent of the first post is valid and there was no need to make fresh appointment on the post – Impugned order quashed – Writ application allowed. (Paras 14 to 16)
Constitution of India – Article 14 & 16 – Adjustment/shifting of Post – The respondent-State did not produce any contrary Statute / law / regulation which debars the shifting of senior most teacher in an affiliated College from unaided post to deficit grant post – The practice of shifting of teachers from sanctioned post without financial aid to sanctioned post with financial aid is being followed in the State in other institutions including the minority institutions and in the present Railway College also three teachers were shifted earlier from without financial aid to financial aid post, as such, the contention of the respondent / State that shifting from without financial aid to financial aid post shall be violative of the Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India is rejected. (Para 13)
Anil Kumar Sinha, J.—The petitioner has preferred the present writ application for a direction to the respondent authorities for adjustment / shifting of his services against the first sanctioned deficit grant post of Lecturer in Physics at Purvottar Railway College, Sonepur, Chapra (hereinafter referred to as “Railway College”) along with all consequential benefits. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of the letter dated 03.09.2014 issued by the Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar addressed to the Registrars of all the Universities communicating the disapproval of the State Government with respect to any kind of shifting and adjustment against vacant sanctioned posts in deficit grant College.
2. The relevant facts giving rise to the present writ application is that the Railway College was initially established in the year 1977-1978 and it is an affiliated unit of Jai Prakash University, Chapra as a deficit grant College. The Railway College was granted affiliation by the State Government at Intermediate level in the year 1979 and at Degree level in the year 1981. Permanent affiliation was granted in the year 1990. Subsequent to grant of affiliation to the Railway College at Intermediate level in 1979, the State Government vide its letter no. 2539 dated 24.12.1979 sanctioned altogether thirteen posts in different subjects including one post in the subject of Physics with financial liability. It is pertinent to mention here that against this one sanctioned post with financial liability in the subject of Physics services of one Shri Anand Mahto was approved / absorbed with effect from 24.12.1979. The petitioner was initially appointed by the Governing Body of the Railway College on a temporary post as a Lecturer in Physics on 19.06.1981 following which the petitioner gave his joining against the said post on 25.06.1981 and started discharging his duties.
3. In the meantime, Department of Education, Government of Bihar vide letter no. 1034 dated 13.10.1987 sanctioned and approved altogether twenty five posts of Lecturers in different subjects including two posts in the subject of Physics without any financial liability. Thereafter, the petitioner continued to discharge his duties as Lecturer against the second post in the subject of Physics and his service was extended from time to time by the concerned authorities under the erstwhile Bihar College Service Commission. Thereafter, vide letter dated 12.03.1997 issued by the Governor’s Secretariat, on the recommendation of the Absorption Committee, the Hon’ble Chancellor absorbed the services of altogether fourteen temporary Lecturers working in the Railway College including the petitioner with effect from the date of sanction of the post by the State Government following which the Registrar of the Jai Prakash University, Chapra vide its letter dated 03.12.1998 communicated to the Secretary of the Governing Body, Railway College informing therein that Syndicate of the University in its meeting dated 30.08.1998 approved the services of altogether thirteen Lecturers of the Railway College in the light of the Governor’s Secretariat letter dated 12.03.1997. From the letter issued by the Registrar of the University it is evident that in the subject of Physics altogether two teachers were absorbed. One Shri Anand Mahto was absorbed against the first post (vitta sahita post) with effect from 24.12.1979 and the petitioner was absorbed against the second post (vitta rahit post) with effect from 13.10.1987.
4. It is the case of the petitioner that after superannuation of Sri Anand Mahto on 31.03.2014 the Governing Body of the Railway College in its meeting dated 20.03.2014 decided to shift / adjust the services of the petitioner on the first sanctioned post (vitta sahit post) with effect from 01.04.2014. Subsequently, the Secretary of the Governing Body of the Railway College vide his letter dt: 15.04.2014 requested the Registrar of the Jai Prakash University to take steps
Appointments against sanctioned posts do not require prior approval from the State Government, allowing for post facto validation and regularization of service.
The court reinforced that salaries must be paid to teachers based on regularized appointments, rejecting any arbitrary withholding by the State as per established constitutional rights, regardless of....
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
The court upheld that the creation of posts is the exclusive prerogative of the state government and cannot be compelled by the judiciary, reaffirming contractual employment does not secure regulariz....
A sanctioned post permits appointment without prior government approval; rejection of appointment was deemed arbitrary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.