IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
Dr. Mamta Kumari D/o-Ram Naresh Chaudhary - Appellant
Versus
The Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University and Ors - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18782 of 2016
Decided on : 01-09-2025
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellant : Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha
For the Respondent : Mr.Madanjit Singh-Gp20
For the University : Mr. Zaki Haider
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the vocational course and petitioner's appointment (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's claims and representations for regularization (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. comparison with similar cases and argument against discrimination (Para 9 , 11) |
| 4. arguments on behalf of the state and university (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. emerging issues for judicial consideration (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. discussion on u.g.c. guidelines and financial responsibilities (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. court precedents on post creation authority (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. court's conclusion and rejection of the writ petition (Para 25) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR SINHA
1. The present writ application has been filed seeking direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities particularly the Department Of Education, Government of Bihar to sanction or create the posts of Lecturers in the Department of “Industrial Fish and Fisheries” in Ramdayalu Singh College, Muzaffarpur (hereinafter referred to as “the College”), a constituent unit of Babasaheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur and to take over the financial liability of the said Department. It has further been prayed that consequent to such creation of posts a direction be issued for granting approval for the regularization of the petitioner’s services as Lecturer in Industrial Fish & Fisheries (vocational subject) in the said College. Alternatively the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities to accord sanction and approval for her regularization on the sanctioned and vacant post of Lecturer in the Department of Zoology in the said College.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present writ application is that the University Grants Commission (for short “U.G.C.”) vide letter dt: 14.06.1996 granted approval for introducing the vocational subject namely “Industrial Fish & Fisheries” in the College with effect from the academic session 1996-1997. 3. It has further been informed by the U.G.C. that the College may appoint staff on contract basis for the said course which would include two Lecturers, one Instructor, one Lab Technician and two Peons. The said letter further clarified that recurring financial support would be provided by U.G.C. for a period of five years only i.e. from 1996-2000 there after the institution was to take steps to meet the expenditure either through support from the State Government or from other sources pursuant to the cessation of U.G.C. assistance as aforesaid.
4. The Vice Chancellor of the Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University (for short “the University”) permitted the commencement of B.Sc. Hons. (vocational course) in Industrial Fish & Fisheries for the academic session 1996-1997 in the Department of Zoology of the College. The decision of the Vice Chancellor was communicated to the Principal of the College by the Registrar of the University vide Memo No. B / 2334 dated 31.07.1996. The College invited application for the post of Lecturers, Instructors and Lab Technicians on contract basis and advertisement to this effect was published in the Daily Newspaper on 02.04.1997. The petitioner applied pursuant to the aforesaid advertisement for the post and on the basis of recommendation of the Selection Committee she was appointed as Instructor with effect from 25.04.1997.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that from the scheme of the U.G.C. communicated through letter dt: 14.06.1996 it appears that after cessation of U.G.C. assistance from 2000-2001 onward the course may continue with support of State Government. When the U.G.C. assistance was about to cease the Registrar of the University vide letter dated 17.08.2001 requested the Joint Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar to grant permission to continue teaching in vocational subject namely “Industrial Fish & Fisheries” and further to provide financial assistance for meeting the recurring expenditure. The University administration has permi
The court upheld that the creation of posts is the exclusive prerogative of the state government and cannot be compelled by the judiciary, reaffirming contractual employment does not secure regulariz....
Appointments against sanctioned posts do not require prior approval from the State Government, allowing for post facto validation and regularization of service.
A sanctioned post permits appointment without prior government approval; rejection of appointment was deemed arbitrary.
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
The State Government's liability for salary payments to college staff as per Section 60-E of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973, and the inability of government orders to override statutory rules.
The court reinforced that salaries must be paid to teachers based on regularized appointments, rejecting any arbitrary withholding by the State as per established constitutional rights, regardless of....
Government cannot deny post creation or appointment approval based on financial reasons when statutory provisions necessitate such positions in educational institutions.
Once a post is sanctioned, prior approval from the State Government is not necessary for appointment; eligibility and suitability can be scrutinized post-appointment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.