MITALI THAKURIA
Joynul Hoque Barbhuiya, S/o. Late Ishad Ali Barbhuiya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, To Be Rep. By The P. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. L. R. Mazumder, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No.1 and Ms. D. Saikia, learned Amicus Curiae representing the respondent No.2.
2. This application is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 challenging the impugned Order dated 12.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge), Cachar, Silchar in Spl.(POCSO) Case No.57/2017, convicting the appellant under Section 4 of the POCSO Act & 376 of IPC and sentenced him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10(ten) years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-in default to Simple Imprisonment of 6(six) months.
3. The brief facts of the appeal is that; on 05.09.2017 the complainant i.e. the mother of the victim lodged a written complaint before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cachar, Silchar stating that prior to the lodging of complaint, the accused appellant used to visit in the house of the complainant and expressed his love towards her minor daughter and with false promise of marriage, he forcibly committed rape upon the minor girl of the complainant. On the p
Santosh Prasad Alias Santosh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2020 3 SCC 443
Lallu Manjhi & Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand reported in 2003 2 SCC 401
The State of Punjab Vs. Gurmit Singh & Ors. reported in 1996 2 SCC 384
The State of M.P. Vs. Dayal Sahu reported in 2005 8 SCC 122
State of Maharasthra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand Jain
State of Rajasthan vs. Om Prakash
Himachal Pradesh v. Raghubir Singh, (1993) 2 SCC 622
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.