SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 927

PURNENDU SINGH
Archana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s S. B. K. Mangalam, Awnish Kumar.
For the Respondent: AC to AG.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. S. B. K. Manglam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AC to learned AG for the State.

2. Petitioners have inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:—

“(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to consider the petitioners’ case for their promotion to the post of Ward Sistery Nursing Sister in the pay-scale prescribed for the post i.e. Pay Level-8 on the ground that if the Respondents have considered the cases of other similary situated General Nurse Midwifery Grade-A and Staff Nurse Grade- A for their temporaty officiating charge of the post but with prescribed pay-scale, the petitioners are also entitled to be considered for such promotion with effect from the same date when they have considered the case of juniors to the petitioners without considering the case of petitioners, who were admittedly senior to them.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding and directing the Respondents Authorities for grant of benefit of pay-scale and the post for all future benefits to the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top