IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
RAJIV ROY, J.
Bibha Kumari, Wife of Dr. Suraj Prakash – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1087 of 2018
Decided On : 22-09-2023
Service Law – Appointment to the post of "Agriculture Coordinator" by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission – Petitioner claiming Reservation to Backward Class Annexure II (Non Creamy Layer) – Under the terms of advertisement issued by the Commission those belonging to Backward Class and Most Backward Class category have to submit caste certificate specifying therein that they do not belong to creamy layer – Though it is not required at the time of counselling, the candidate belonging to Backward Class/Most Backward Class must submit the non-creamy layer certificate in support of his/her claim and in its absence, they are to be considered under general category and not to be given the benefits of the reservation – The petitioner though appeared for the counselling and submitted other documents, she failed to submit her non-creamy layer certificate which was incorporated therein – In this backdrop, the petitioner was not considered under Backward Class category and was not extended the benefit of Backward Class cut off but was shifted to general category – The petitioner failed to do so and the 'Commission' was justified in considering her case under general category and her score was below the cut off marks required for a general category – Petitioner has crossed the age bar – The writ petition dismissed. (Paras 36 to 41, 49 & 50)
(2016) 4 SCC 754; 2017 (4) PLJR 786 (Paras 7, 17, 18); LPA No. 1311/2019 D-7.11.2022 – Referred.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and qualifications of the petitioner. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 2. petitioner's claim and arguments regarding documentation. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 3. judicial observations on procedural requirements. (Para 35 , 36 , 38) |
| 4. final ruling on the petition. (Para 50 , 52) |
JUDGMENT :
(Rajiv Roy, J.)
Heard the parties.
2. This application has been preferred for the:-
(i) quash the order bearing Memo No. 2223 dated 24.08.2017 passed by the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna (henceforth for short, ‘the Commission’) whereby and where under the objection filed by the petitioner that she belongs to Backward Class Annexure II (Non Creamy Layer) has been rejected and she has been treated as general category candidate on the ground that she did not submitted the non Creamy layer certificate with caste certificate, with regard to belonging to Backward Class Annexure II Non Creamy Layer at the time of counseling;
(ii) to quash the entire revised result issued under Memo No. 40321 dated 29.12.2017 (uploaded on website of ‘the Commission’ http://bssc.bih.nic.in) since the name of petitioner having Roll No. 21509280 does not find place in the said result;
(iii) for quashing of the letter no. 35 dated 08.01.2018 issued under signature of the Director, Agriculture, Bihar, Patna informing therein that on the basis of recommendation received from ‘the Commission’ for appointment of Agriculture Coordinator pursuant to Advertisement No. 02010115 dated 29.04.2015 shall start from 11.01.2018 to 10.02.2018.
(b) for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents:
(i) to accept the candidature of the petitioner under Backward Class Annexure II Non Creamy Layer category candidate and publish her result as successful candidate under WBC category for appointment on the post of Agriculture Coordinator;
(ii) to include the name of the petitioner in the results published vide Memo No. 2198 dated 05.08.2016, Memo No. 75 dated 24.01.2017 and Memo No. 3743 dated 24.11.2017 or in case of issuance of further revised result direct the respondents to include her name in the said revised result after rectifying the mistakes/irregularities which have been committed in preparation of aforesaid results in the light of order passed, if any by this Hon'ble Court;
(iii) for directing the respondents to come out with final result for including the name of the petitioner and recommend her name so that she may be appointed as Agriculture Coordinator in the department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar.
(c) for a direction commanding the respondents to issue appointment letter to the petitioner after following the procedures laid down in Resolution No. 2082 dated 01.04.2003 issued by General Administration Department, Government of Bihar.
3. The case in narrow compass is/are as follows:
(ii) on the basis of aforesaid qualification, petitioner was earlier selected for working as Subject Matter Specialist in District Agriculture Office, Madhubani, Govt. of Bihar on contract basis and where she worked from 17.05.2010 to 18.07.2011. Thereafter the post of Subject Matter Specialist was abolished and further those having graduation degree in Agriculture Science, were engaged as Agriculture Coordinator;
(iv) Since the petitioner was having graduation degree in B.Sc. (Horticulture), she was not engaged;
(v) the petitioner belongs to Backward Class (Annexure II Non Creamy layer category);
(v) ‘the Commission’ came out with an advertisement no. 02010115 dated 29.04.2015 for appointment of 4391 Agriculture coordinators. Out of aforesaid 4391 posts, while 781 posts were kept reserved for Extremely Backward Class category candidates and 131 posts were kept reserved for Women candidates of Backward Class. The requisite qualification for applying for such post was Graduate in
Candidates must submit all required certificates at the time of counseling to claim reservation benefits.
Adherence to terms and conditions in the advertisement and the stipulated selection procedure is crucial for claiming reservation. The requirement of non-creamy layer certificate for reservation agai....
The judgment established the principle that a person's OBC status is by birth and not by acquisition at a later stage, and certificates are an affirmation of existing status. It emphasized the import....
Adherence to specified deadlines and requirements outlined in the advertisement is crucial for the validity of caste certificates and the selection process.
A caste certificate's format does not negate its validity if it proves eligibility for OBC status, emphasizing the need for a pragmatic approach in interpreting reservation laws.
The court established that for claiming reservation benefits under the Jharkhand Reservation Rules, a caste certificate must be in the prescribed format that specifies the candidate's category and no....
The main legal point established is the importance of considering candidates under the correct caste category, taking into account the fluidity of caste classifications and the lack of specific provi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.