SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 506

ANSHUMAN
Nivedita Mandal – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arvind Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manish Kumar (GP-4).

Dr. Anshuman, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission.

2. The present writ application has been filed for quashing the final result so far as the same relates to the petitioner published by Bihar Public Service Commission of 60th, 61st and 62nd Combined Joint Competitive Examination dated 01.02.2019 whereby the result of the petitioner, who passed successfully in preliminary and main examination, has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioner did not get verified her Creamy Layer Certificate with its original and, therefore, her candidature was considered into general category. As the petitioner did not obtain minimum cut-off marks of general category, he was not selected in the final result of the Bihar Public Service Commission. Further prayer has been made that case of the petitioner be considered in the successful candidate treating the petitioner as E.B.C. (non-creamy layer) candidate and direction be given to the respondent to appoint the petitioner on a suitable post treating her a candidate belonging to E.B.C. (Female) candidate.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top