SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1147

ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Basudeo Prasad Sah @ Vasudeo Prasad Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha.
For the Respondents: Mr. Prabhakar Jha (GP-27).

Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.—Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The present writ application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for the following reliefs:—

(i) For quashing of the order contained in memo no.2315 dated 25.08.2015, issued under the signature of the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Education Department, Bhagalpur, whereby the pension of the petitioner has been forfeited under the provisions of Rule 43(a) of the Bihar Pension Rules.

(ii) For directing the respondent to produce a copy of enquiry report contained in letter no.157 dated 17.11.2012 and further be pleased to quash the same as the same is perverse and based upon no evidence.

(iii) For directing the respondents to sanction full pension and gratuity to the petitioner apart from other consequential retirement benefits payable to him.

(iv) For any other writ, order or direction which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the case at length is that petitioner was working as Headmaster of the Middle School Ratanganj-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, he was arrested by the Vigilance Investigation Bureau while accepting bri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top