IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR
Mushafir Singh, Son of Late Sidan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on petitioner's employment and disciplinary action. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. procedural defects in disciplinary proceedings were noted. (Para 5) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against disciplinary action. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's analysis of disciplinary procedure and evidence standards. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 26) |
| 5. application of rule 43(c) on superannuation and pending proceedings. (Para 27 , 30) |
| 6. pension rights must comply with lawful processes even post-superannuation. (Para 28) |
| 7. order of back wages and pension entitlements. (Para 32 , 35) |
| 8. court directed compensation and reinstatement of pension rights. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT :
(HARISH KUMAR, J.)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order as contained Memo No. 820 dated 04.04.2014 passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Collectorate, Nalanda, whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of withholding of permanent pension till his life.
3. Short facts as culled out from the materials available on record are that, the petitioner was initially appointed as an Amin on 20.10.1973. Wh
Dr. Hira Lal v. State of Bihar and Others
State of Jharkhand v. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava
Shambhu Saran v. State of Bihar
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad v. B. Karunakar,
Roop Singh Negi v. Punjab National Bank and Others
Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Gold Mines Ltd. and Another
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others v. Saroj Kumar Sinha
Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya and Others
Pension rights cannot be revoked without adherence to due process, ensuring legal and procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings, especially when misconduct charges remain pending.
The court emphasized the importance of conducting departmental proceedings in accordance with the principle of natural justice and directed payment of provisional pension to the petitioner.
Disciplinary proceedings against government employees must be conducted fairly, based on adequate evidence, and require reasoned decisions to uphold the principles of natural justice.
The absence of evidence in disciplinary proceedings renders any punitive action unsustainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.