SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1415

AJIT KUMAR
Shiv Shankar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Binod Kumar.
For the Respondents: Ms. Namrata Singh, AC to GA-12

Ajit Kumar, J.—Heard Mr. Binod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Namrata Singh, learned AC to GA-12 for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for following relief(s):—

“(i) For quashing of Order dated 04-05-2020 contained in Memo No. 421 issued under the signature of respondent Director Primary Education, Patna, Bihar by which entire amount of pension of the petitioner was forfeited under the proceeding of Rule 43(A) of Bihar Pension Rules, 1950.

(ii) For direction of respondents for payment of pension amount of the petitioner with arrears.

(iii) For any relief(s) for which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present case”.

3. The facts of the case, in brief, is that the petitioner was member of Bihar Subordinate Education Service and was posted as Block Education Officer, Dhanarua, District- Patna and while he was posted in the aforesaid Block, a complaint was filed against him for the allegation of demand of Rs. 5000/- as bribe for releasing salary of one Nand Kumar, Teacher of Middle School, Panditganj, District-Patna. Pursuant to the aforesaid complaint the Vigilance Team trapped the petitioner for demand of Rs. 500

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top