SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1158

SANDEEP KUMAR
Anup Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Jai Shankar Pathak.
For the Respondent: Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP.

Sandeep Kumar, J.—Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is an appeal against the order and judgment of conviction dated 29.11.2018 and order of sentence dated 30.11.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Ara, Bhojpur in Sessions Trial No. 334/2013 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of which further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 days and further conviction for offence punishable under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of seven years and further conviction for offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of one year and also pay fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of which further undergo R.I. for 5 days.

3. The prosecution case in brief is that the marriage of the daughter of the informant namely, Prity Devi was solemnized with Anup Kumar (appellant) in the year 2007. After the marriage, she was enjoying her conjugal life but after so

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top