SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 35

ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Tejan Singh @ Tej Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Anil Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr.Raj Kishore Roy-GP-18.

Alok Kumar Pandey, J.—In the instant writ petition, petitioners have prayed for the following relief (s):—

“I. For setting aside the order dated 7.12.2017 passed by the Ld. Member (Administration) the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.LT. Case no. 480/2017 whereby and where under the B.L.T. case no. 480/2017 was said to not maintainable in this tribunal in the light of perused order of Hon'ble apex court in Civil Appeal no. 4726 and 4729- 4739/2017.

II. For getting aside the order dated 16.3.2017 passed by the Division Commissioner, Darbhanga in Land Dispute appeal no. 64 of 2013 affirming the order of the ld. D.C.L.R. Darbhanga dated 19.1.2013 in B.L.D.R. case no. 459/12-13 on the ground of mis-joinder of necessary party which is an error of record.

III. For further setting aside the order dated 19.1.2013 passed by the Id. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Darbhanga in B.L.D.R. case no. 459/12-13 whereby and where under the Circle Officer Baheri has been directed to remove the encroachment from 6 decimal of land of Khata no. 708(old), Khesra no. 1130(old), new Khesra no. 1776.”

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case is that respondent nos. 6 & 7 filed Case No. 459/12-13 before the DCLR,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top