ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Tejan Singh @ Tej Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Alok Kumar Pandey, J.—In the instant writ petition, petitioners have prayed for the following relief (s):—
“I. For setting aside the order dated 7.12.2017 passed by the Ld. Member (Administration) the Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in B.LT. Case no. 480/2017 whereby and where under the B.L.T. case no. 480/2017 was said to not maintainable in this tribunal in the light of perused order of Hon'ble apex court in Civil Appeal no. 4726 and 4729- 4739/2017.
II. For getting aside the order dated 16.3.2017 passed by the Division Commissioner, Darbhanga in Land Dispute appeal no. 64 of 2013 affirming the order of the ld. D.C.L.R. Darbhanga dated 19.1.2013 in B.L.D.R. case no. 459/12-13 on the ground of mis-joinder of necessary party which is an error of record.
III. For further setting aside the order dated 19.1.2013 passed by the Id. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Darbhanga in B.L.D.R. case no. 459/12-13 whereby and where under the Circle Officer Baheri has been directed to remove the encroachment from 6 decimal of land of Khata no. 708(old), Khesra no. 1130(old), new Khesra no. 1776.”
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case is that respondent nos. 6 & 7 filed Case No. 459/12-13 before the DCLR,
Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable in property disputes where a title suit is pending, as such matters should be resolved in civil courts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.