SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 586

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, PARTHA SARTHY
Ramnasib Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Navendu Kumar.
For the Respondents: M/s Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12, Arun Kumar Bhagat, A.C. to AAG-12, Abhya Kumar.

Partha Sarthy, J.—Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the State of Bihar and learned counsel for the respondent no.6.

2. The subject matter of the instant case are six plots appertaining to Khata no.474, Plot no.113 measuring an area of 0.14 decimal; Khata no.474, Plot no.1995 measuring an area of 0.94 decimal; Khata no.234, Plot no.2881 measuring an area of 0.95 decimal; Khata no.18 Plot no.2617 measuring an area of 0.11 decimal; Khata no.65 Plot no.2486 measuring an area of 0.15.5 decimal and Khata no.221 Plot no.2642 measuring an area of 0.03 decials, all in Mauza Govindpur Sadaweh under Police Station Dulhin Bazar in the District of Patna.

3. The case of the writ petitioner in brief is that he is the absolute owner of the above lands in question as a result of purchase of three of the plots by registered sale deed by his ancestors and the other three plots through deed of exchange obtained by his father, the sale deed and the deed of exchange having been brought on record as annexures to the writ application.

4. It is submitted that Jamabandi was created in the name of his father and he has been paying rent and getting rent receipt. Rent receipt for the ye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top