Back
ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Tapeshwar Prasad, Son of Uttam Prasad @ Uttim Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J.)
In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief :-
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has approached this Court against the order of BLT passed on 23.08.2017. Learned counsel submits that order of DCLR is annexed at annexure-10 which is allowed in the favour of the petitioner. Against the order of DCLR, respondent no. 5 approached BLT and BLT has given direction that aggrieved party knock the door of the competent civil court. Learned counsel for the
Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable in property disputes where a title suit is pending, as such matters should be resolved in civil courts.
Writ jurisdiction cannot resolve property disputes pending in civil courts, emphasizing that appropriate remedies should be pursued through the general legal system.
The court upheld the right of descendants of recorded tenants to claim ownership of ancestral land despite prior administrative decisions.
interim protection granted in favour of the parties is to continue, but the same shall not govern the decision of the Court. The basis for adjudication shall need to be the oral as well as documentar....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
