SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 36

HARISH KUMAR
Uma Shankar Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Adv., Shailesh Kumar Sharma.
For the State : Mr. Nadim Seraj, GP-5.

Harish Kumar, J.—This Court has heard Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, learned Senior Advocate along with Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sharma, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Nadim Seraj, learned Advocate for the State.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved with the resolution of the General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, as contained in Memo No. 6626 dated 01.06.2017, whereby he has been inflicted with the punishment of dismissal from his service with a further direction that he shall not be eligible for future employment in the Government. The petitioner has also assailed the order contained in Memo No. 4334 dated 03.04.2018, whereby the memorial preferred by the petitioner against the dismissal order came to be rejected.

3. The facts as emerging from the materials available on record(s) are summarized hereinbelow:—

(i) The petitioner was a Member of Bihar Administrative Service and while he was posted in the District of East Champaran, Motihari, on the post of Director National Employment Programme (District Rural Development Authority), an FIR was instituted against him by the Economic Office Unit of the Bihar Government bearing E.O.U. P.S. Case No. 31 of 2013 on 17.07.201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top