MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Narendra Kumar Dhiraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Mohit Kumar Shah, J. – The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order of punishment of dismissal from service dated 10.5.2022, passed by the Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai, as also the appellate order dated 25.07.2022, whereby and whereunder the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Bihar, Patna has dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner. Lastly, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21.03.2023, passed by the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, whereby the memorial filed by the petitioner has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the petitioner joined as Constable on 13.05.1988 and was posted initially at District Force, Aurangabad, whereafter he was posted as Constable at various places and while he was posted in the Nalanda District in the year 1998, he was selected as the President, Bihar Police Men’s Association, Nalanda Branch, Nalanda. Thereafter, also the petitioner had continued to be the office bearer/President of the Bihar Police Men’s Association. In the year 2020 when the respondent no. 10 was appointed as Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, in contravention to
Oryx Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Saroj Kumar Sinha
Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank
M.V. Bijlani vs. Union of India
Kumar Upendra Singh Parimar vs. B.S. Cooperative Land Development Bank Ltd.
Narinder Mohan Arya vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Deepali Gundu Surwase vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya
The absence of a witness list in a disciplinary charge memo violates procedural fairness, rendering the proceedings invalid, necessitating adherence to natural justice principles.
In cases of wrongful termination of service, reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages is the normal rule. The onus lies on the employer to specifically plead and prove that the employe....
The charges against the petitioner did not constitute misconduct, and the finding of the enquiring authority was unsustainable due to lack of evidence and legal infirmity. The impugned order of dismi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.