SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 16

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Anuj Shuckla – Appellant
Versus
Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr Adv.

Arvind Singh Chandel, J.—This petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:—

“(i) For quashing the Order/Memo No 6778/Estt dated 20.10.2023 issued by Executive Director (Operations), BIADA (Annexure P/13), Patna whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service by the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as BIADA) on 20.10.2023, in most arbitrary manner without compliance of the principles of natural justice and in complete violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, equity and against all the canons of justice.

(ii) For quashing the Order dated 04.09.2024 passed in Appeal Case No 3 of 2023 communicated to the petitioner vide Memo No 4603 dated 09.09.2024 (Annexure P/16) by the Respondent No 2, whereby and where under the Appeal filed by the Petitioner has been dismissed in a mechanical, arbitrary, pick and choose manner, whereas the similarly situated coterminus contractual employees have been reinstated considering the fact that the termination of the Petitioner is termination stigmatic and without compliance of the principles of natural justice, service jurisprudence and in teeth of the servi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top