Arvind Singh Chandel, J.—Heard finally.

2. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:—

“(i) Quashing of the Letter/order bearing Memo No. 2680 dated 27.12.2019 by which, the Director, Employment and Training, Labour Resources Department, Patna has framed the Memo of Charge in extreme derogation of the statutory requirement of decision on initiation of proceedings being taken by the Disciplinary authority, the Director without authority of law has constituted a Three Member Committee.

(ii) Quashing of the Resolution bearing Memo No. 1367 dated 28.07.2021 by which, on the basis of the defective Memo of Charge, the proceeding have been initiated under the provisions of Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005;

(iii) Quashing of the Enquiry Report dated 18.02.2022 as communicated vide Letter No. 501 by which, the Enquiry Officer, contrary to the procedural requirement under Rule 17 of the Bihar Government Servant (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 has proceeded to continue with the Departmental Enquiry and submitted the perfunctory enquiry report in the absence of any participation by the presenting Officer.

(iv) Quashing of the Letter No. 830 dated 08.04.2022 by which, after lapse of two months of the submission of the enquiry report, the petitioner has been asked to submit the Second Show Cause Reply against the enquiry report without furnishing the relied upon documents by the Enquiry Officer which was annexed along with the enquiry report;

(v) Quashing of the consequential punishment order as contained in Resolution bearing Memo No. 441 dated 10.02.2023 by which, the Disciplinary Authority on the basis of the irregular Departmental proceedings, has inflicted a major penalty withholding of two increments with cumulative effect.

(vi) Quashing of the consequential order bearing Memo No. 2045 dated 24.07.2023 by which, the Disciplinary Authority/Government has dismissed the review filed by the petitioner without assigning any cogent reason; and

(vii) Restraining the respondents from giving effect to order dated 10.02.2023 as contained in Resolution bearing Memo No. 441 by which, the major penalty of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect has been inflicted during the pendency of the present writ application.”

3. The brief facts of the case is that on 05.07.2016 the petitioner joined on the post of Principal of I.T.I, Begusarai and on 25.08.2018 a detailed notice pertaining to examination fee etc. for the scheduled examination SCVT, 2018 was affixed on a notice board. The examination was held as per scheduled and the result was declared on 15.04.2019. After declaration of the result, certain allegations were made by some of the unsuccessful candidates that some of the employees of the I.T.I. college were collected illegal amount from the candidates. Some persons were also made a video-graph and the same was also uploaded on the YouTube. The Director of the Employment and Training, Labour Resources Department constituted a three member committee for making a comprehensive enquiry in connection with video, which was uploaded on the YouTube relating to the affairs of the I.T.I. college. The committee submitted its report on 11.06.2019. No any adverse remarks was reported against the petitioner. However, the committee opined that the petitioner being a Principal did not take any action. Therefore, it may be presumed that he had given deemed consent. On the basis of the enquiry report, the explanation was sought from the petitioner, which has been duly replied by the petitioner vide Annexure-P/4. Subsequently, the Director, Employment and Training framed a Memo of Charge against the petitioner on 27.12.2019 and forwarded the same to the Deputy Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Government of Bihar for further necessary action. Subsequently, the memo was issued by the Deputy Secretary vide Memo No. 293 dated 11.02.2020 asking the petitioner to show ca