Back
HARISH KUMAR
Mahadev Enclave Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Harish Kumar, J.—This Court has heard Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned Spl. P.P. for the Mines Department. The State is represented through G.A.-7.
2. Considering the identical nature of claim based upon same set of facts raising identical issue, with the consent of parties, both the writ petitions are being heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
3. Notably, the petitioner in both the writ petition is one and the same registered Company, who participated in the auction, pursuant to Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) issued by the Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, in relation to settlement of sand ghats at Nalanda and Banka districts, hence two writ petitions are filed for identical reliefs; hence for disposal of the cases, the Company is being referred as petitioner.
4. The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned respondent to grant 82 days of settlement for mining rights for the district of Banka and likewise additional 63 days for mining right for the district of Nalanda with respect to the calendar year 2018. In the
Illegal Sand Mining – Unless detailed DSRs are prepared by Sub-Divisional Committees by undertaking site visits and using modern technology and unless same are examined by SEAC and SEIAA, it will not....
Administrative authorities must apply the principle of equality under Article 14, ensuring consistent and fair treatment, particularly in cases of similar circumstances and rights related to governme....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
