SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 59

RAJIV ROY
Md. Islam @ Phul Babu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Rahul Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, APP.

Rajiv Roy, J.—Heard Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the sole appellant and Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, learned APP.

2. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 06.11.2023/09.11.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-13, East Champaran, Motihari by which while exonerating the other accused persons of the charges, the appellant, Md. Islam @ Phul Babu has been convicted under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years with a further direction to that the period already undergone by the convict shall be set off from the period of sentence.

3. Earlier the appeal was admitted on 29.01.2024 by the Co-ordinate Bench and the Trial Court Record was called for which has now been received.

4. As per the prosecution story, the informant, the father of the victim (PW 4) alleged that on 14.01.2013, he received telephonic information about the killing of his daughter, Afsana Khatoon by the in-laws. On receipt of such information, when he along with his son, Md. Saddam and a co-villager went to the matrimonial home, none of the accused persons were present and the villagers informed that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top