A. ABHISHEK REDDY
Md. Rahmat Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
A. Abhishek Reddy, J. – Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s): –
“(i) For issuance of appropriate writ(s) thereby quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 13.12.2022 as contained in Memo No. 02 dated 02.01.2023 passed by the respondent Divisional Commissioner, Purnea in Supply Revision No. 60/2022 (Md. Skahir Raza vs. the State of Bihar & ors.) whereby the said respondent while allowing the revision filed by the respondent no. 8 has reversed the order dated 15.03.2022 passed by the respondent no. 4 in Supply Appeal Case No. 188/2019 thereby directing the competent authority to select the respondent no. 8 as PDS dealer for Block- Kasba, Gram Panchayat Gurhi, Distt.-Purnea.
(ii) For consequently issuance of appropriate writ(s) thereby directing the respondents concerned to grant the petitioner PDS dealer license for Gram Panchayat, Gurhi, Block Kasba, Distt.-Purnea as he fulfills all the requisite eligibility for the same which is required under Clause 9 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.
(iii) For grant of any other relief (s) which the petitioner may be entitled to
Eligibility is affirmed if qualifications are acquired before the cut-off date, irrespective of proof submission timing; proof is secondary to qualification possession.
The court emphasized that qualifications in computer knowledge are paramount for PDS dealership appointments, prioritizing relevant degrees over unrelated higher education.
The court emphasized exhausting alternative remedies under the applicable administrative order before proceeding with judicial intervention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.