Sunil Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Pat) 209

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Pat) 209

ANSHUMAN
Sunil Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Awadhesh Kumar Mishra, Shivani Mishra, Pragati Singh, Shashank Shekhar.
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar (AC to GP-4).

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned Counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed in the nature of writ of mandamus for the following relief/s: –

I. For directing the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner on the post of Constable in District Police Force, Bettiah on the ground of his being a successful candidate in all the test and examination conducted in pursuance of Advertisement No.01/1998.

II. For any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled for.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has appeared in the examination process on the post of Constable in District Police Force, Bettiah in pursuant to Advertisement No.01/1998. Counsel submits that the petitioner has participated in the entire process having height of 174 c.m. and chest was also more than the requirement as per the said advertisement. Counsel further submits that petitioner appeared in the physical efficiency test and written test in which he was declared successful. But, despite the fact that petitioner secured a very good position in the physical as well as written examination, he was not appointed, wher

Click Here to Read the rest of this document