Tripesh Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Pat) 211

JITENDRA KUMAR
Tripesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Ashok Kumar Garg, Sanjeev Kumar Pathak.
For the State : Mr. Ramchandra Singh (App-51).
For the O.P. Nos. 2, : M/s Ravi Shankar 3 and 4 Roy.

Jitendra Kumar, J. – The present criminal revision petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 01.12.2017 passed by learned Fast Track Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2003, whereby learned Appellate Court has set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.03.2003 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Vaishali at Hajipur who has convicted the O.P. Nos. 2, 3 and 4 herein under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced accordingly.

Factual background

2. The factual background of the case is that on the fardbeyan of the victim/informant Ramjee Singh, Lalganj P.S. Case No. 138 of 1995 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 326 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused persons including Opposite Parties Nos. 2, 3 and 4 herein.

3. During the trial arising out of Lalganj P.S. Case No. 138 of 1995, learned Trial Court has convicted the accused, who are opposite parties herein, under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and one co-accused was acquitted of all the charges. Thereafter, convicts who are O.P. Nos.2, 3 and