SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 517

ARUN KUMAR JHA
Naresh Jha – Appellant
Versus
Chandan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Md. Waliur Rahman, Kumar Praveen.
For the Respondents: M/s Binod Bihari Sinha, Amarjeet Chaudhary, Ajay Dutt Mishra.

Arun Kumar Jha, J. – The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 02.02.2023 passed by learned Sub Judge-IV, Rosera in Title Suit No. 199 of 2020 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court rejected the application dated 07.03.2022 of the intervenerpetitioner filed under Order 1, Rule 10 (2) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’).

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, as it appears from the record, are that the plaintiff/respondent 1st set filed Title Suit No. 199/2020 before the court of learned Sub Judge- IV, Rosera for a decree of specific performance of contract in respect of agreement for sale dated 05.10.2018 executed by the defendant/respondent 2nd set with ancillary reliefs. The defendant appeared and filed his written statement and contested the suit. The intervener petitioner coming to know about the pendency of the suit approached the learned trial court and filed an application dated 07.03.2022 for impleading him as a party defendant under Order 1, Rule 10 (2) read with Section 151 of the Code. The plaintiff/respondent 1st set filed rejoinder dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top