Back
A. ABHISHEK REDDY
Office of the District Commandant Bihar Home Guards, Chapra, District Saran – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization Ministry of Labour, Government of India – Respondent
A. Abhishek Reddy, J. – As the issue involved in the present writ petitions are one and the same, all the cases are disposed of by a common judgment.
2. For the purpose of convenience, the facts in the CWJC No. 848 of 2024 are reiterated.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. The writ petition No. 848 of 2024 has been filed for the following relief(s): –
“a. For issuance of an appropriate Writ/ Writs, direction/directions in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus calling upon the Respondents to produce the entire records pertaining to the quantification done for levying interest and damages under Section 14B and 7Q of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and upon being satisfied be pleased to set aside the demand raised for failure to pay the contributions for the period 01/09/2019 to 31/03/2021 within the stipulated time vide letter No.- BR/RO/MUZ/ENF/14B/BRMUZ1993823000/ORDER/ 1201 and letter No.- BR/RO/MUZ/ENF/70/BRMUZ1993823000/ ORDER/1201 dated 21.11.2022 respectively issued under the Signature of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Ministry of Labour, Government of India, Regional Office, Su
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
