SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Abhiram Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Ansul, learned senior counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 420, 120(B), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The prosecution case, as unfolded in the first information report, indicates that a 36 years old informant (lady), Panchayat Raj Officer, posted at Siwan, lodged the present case against the 32 years old petitioner, who was unemployed then, that they were thrown together during coaching classes three years back and the acquaintance developed into an intimacy, followed by a proposal of marriage by the petitioner. Subsequently, they entered into physical relationship and the informant has alleged that she was sexually exploited on the pretext of marriage, which was subsequently denied by the petitioner.
4. Before going into the merits of the case, the preliminary objection to the grant of anticipatory bail raised by Mr. Ansul, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of informant, requires to be first ad
Srikant Upadhyay vs. State of Bihar
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia etc vs. State of Punjab
Inder Mohan Goswami vs. State of Uttranchal
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.