SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 638

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Purnendu Singh, J.
Angad Kumar Singh S/o Rameshwar Singh and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Health and ors. – Respondents 
Civil Review No.16 of 2024, Civil Review No. 43 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9954 of 2022
Decided On : 11-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate, Mr.Mukesh Kant, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, AC to AAG 9, Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate

The Indian Red Cross Society must adhere to statutory election procedures, and the High Court may only intervene in elections under exceptional circumstances, emphasizing the necessity of following the designated statutory remedies.

Headnote:(A) Indian Red Cross Society Act, 1920 - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Review of writ petition - Petitioners challenged election results as unconstitutional citing absence of voter registration approval by National Committee - Court found procedures of registration and election non-compliant, leading to invalidation of the election result. (Paras 7, 17, 18, 36, 48, 53)

(B) Jurisdiction of High Court - High Court cannot interfere with election results under Article 226 unless there are exceptional circumstances - Statutory remedies should be exhausted prior to invoking High Court’s jurisdiction. (Paras 5, 12, 49)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners claim lack of fairness in the election process due to alleged manipulation in the voter list and the election being conducted without proper approvals from the National Committee. They sought a review of a judgment invalidating the election held on 12.06.2022, which they argue was not correctly represented in the original writ. (Paras 3, 5, 17)

Findings of Court:
Election held on 12.06.2022 declared invalid due to non-compliance with requisite approvals and regulations. The process was marred by alleged malpractices, and the failure of parties to follow the statutory requirements led to the court's intervention. (Paras 7, 53)

Issues: Key issues addressed include maintainability of the writ petition under Article 226 and whether the election process was flawed due to the absence of valid voter registrations. (Paras 5, 36)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the requirement for National Committee approval for voter inclusion and specified that elections must be conducted following statutory guidance; therefore direct intervention by the Court is limited when other legal remedies exist. (Paras 12, 41)

Result: Review petitions disposed of with directions for compliance with statutory processes prior to future elections.

Table of Content
1. introduction and background information (Para 1 , 2)
2. grounds for the review petition (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. maintaining the integrity of election processes (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
4. criteria for review petition admissibility (Para 12 , 17 , 18)
5. supervisory role of higher governing bodies (Para 19 , 22)
6. limits of judicial intervention in election matters (Para 30 , 42)
7. conclusion regarding election process and next steps (Para 35 , 50 , 51)
8. final order of disposed review petitions (Para 57)

JUDGMENT :

Purnendu Singh, J.

Heard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel along with Mr. Mukesh Kant, Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, learned AC to AAG 9 for the State.

2. The issue and ground of review involved in both the civil review is similar, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

3. Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel along with Mukesh Kant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the Indian Red Cross Society has directed to convene a meeting of Managing Committee of Indian Red Cross Society, Bihar State Branch for conducting election of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Treasurer of new State Managing Committee on 21.07.2025 at 11:00 a.m at Darbar Hall, Raj Bhawan, Patna but the voter list don’t find names of the present review petitioners due to malafide act of the present chairman of the State Unit. He further submitted that name of representative of District Brnach Head of Motihari, Dr. Ajay Kumar also don’t figure in the voter list, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure 2.

4. Petitioners have sought review of the order dated 11.12.2023 passed in CWJC No.9954 of 2022 firstly on the ground that the writ petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the Red Cross Society don’t come within the purview of the State or other authority or instrumentality or agency to discharge the public function and as such is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court, secondly the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot interfere with the election process or with the result of the election declared.

5. The present review petitions arise out of CWJC No.9954 of 2022. The aforesaid writ petition was filed for the following reliefs:-

“i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the election and election result held on 12.06.2022 and declaring the election as illegal and ultra vires as the same was conducted by the District Magistrate and District administration Motihari against the rules and regulations of Indian Red Cross Society and against basic tenants of election laws.

ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to hold a free and fair election of the Managing Committee of Indian Red Cross Society, District branch, Motihari in accordance with the rules and regulations of Indian Red Cross Society and in accordance with basic tenants of election laws.

iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Managing committee of Indian Red Cross Society, District branch, Motihari not to use financial power and not to function as office bearer of the Indian Red Cross Society, District branch, Motihari.

iv. Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

6. The writ petition was filed for quashing the entire election result held on 12.06.2022 and declaring the result as illegal. The main grievance of the petitioner of the writ petition was that against the action of the District Magistrate, Motihari who had allegedly conducted the election in unfair, unreasonable and illegal manner by flouting the Indian Red Cross Society Uniform Rules (hereinafter referred as IRCS – Uniform Rules and guidelines. The review petitioners support the result of the election held on 12.06.2022.

7. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top