IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Purnendu Singh, J.
Angad Kumar Singh S/o Rameshwar Singh and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Health and ors. – Respondents
Civil Review No.16 of 2024, Civil Review No. 43 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9954 of 2022
Decided On : 11-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and background information (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. grounds for the review petition (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. maintaining the integrity of election processes (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. criteria for review petition admissibility (Para 12 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. supervisory role of higher governing bodies (Para 19 , 22) |
| 6. limits of judicial intervention in election matters (Para 30 , 42) |
| 7. conclusion regarding election process and next steps (Para 35 , 50 , 51) |
| 8. final order of disposed review petitions (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
Purnendu Singh, J.
Heard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel along with Mr. Mukesh Kant, Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, learned AC to AAG 9 for the State.
2. The issue and ground of review involved in both the civil review is similar, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.
3. Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel along with Mukesh Kant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the Indian Red Cross Society has directed to convene a meeting of Managing Committee of Indian Red Cross Society, Bihar State Branch for conducting election of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Treasurer of new State Managing Committee on 21.07.2025 at 11:00 a.m at Darbar Hall, Raj Bhawan, Patna but the voter list don’t find names of the present review petitioners due to malafide act of the present chairman of the State Unit. He further submitted that name of representative of District Brnach Head of Motihari, Dr. Ajay Kumar also don’t figure in the voter list, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure 2.
4. Petitioners have sought review of the order dated 11.12.2023 passed in CWJC No.9954 of 2022 firstly on the ground that the writ petition is not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as the Red Cross Society don’t come within the purview of the State or other authority or instrumentality or agency to discharge the public function and as such is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court, secondly the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot interfere with the election process or with the result of the election declared.
5. The present review petitions arise out of CWJC No.9954 of 2022. The aforesaid writ petition was filed for the following reliefs:-
“i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the election and election result held on 12.06.2022 and declaring the election as illegal and ultra vires as the same was conducted by the District Magistrate and District administration Motihari against the rules and regulations of Indian Red Cross Society and against basic tenants of election laws.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to hold a free and fair election of the Managing Committee of Indian Red Cross Society, District branch, Motihari in accordance with the rules and regulations of Indian Red Cross Society and in accordance with basic tenants of election laws.
iii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Managing committee of Indian Red Cross Society, District branch, Motihari not to use financial power and not to function as office bearer of the Indian Red Cross Society, District branch, Motihari.
iv. Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”
6. The writ petition was filed for quashing the entire election result held on 12.06.2022 and declaring the result as illegal. The main grievance of the petitioner of the writ petition was that against the action of the District Magistrate, Motihari who had allegedly conducted the election in unfair, unreasonable and illegal manner by flouting the Indian Red Cross Society Uniform Rules (hereinafter referred as IRCS – Uniform Rules and guidelines. The review petitioners support the result of the election held on 12.06.2022.
7. The
Puran Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Ors.
ABL International Ltd. & Another Vs. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. & Others
Unitech Ltd. & Others Vs. Telagana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) & others
Board of Control for Cricket in India Vs. Cricket Association of Bihar & Others
Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Another vs. union of India & Others
Board of Control for Cricket in India Vs. Cricket Association of Bihar & Others
Ramakrishna Mission & Another vs. Kago Kunya & Others
St. Mary's Education Society and Another vs. Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and Others
K.K. Saksena Versus International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage and others
Nanhoo Mal and others v. Hira Mal and others
Gajanan Krishnaji Bapat and another v. Dattaji Raghobaji Meghe and others
AI
The Indian Red Cross Society must adhere to statutory election procedures, and the High Court may only intervene in elections under exceptional circumstances, emphasizing the necessity of following t....
Court emphasizes that once the election process has commenced, judicial interference is limited, and eligibility for voting must comply with established rules within organizational frameworks.
A dispute arising among the members of a society registered under the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001, relating to the affairs of the society, is to be resolved through the mechanism provided u....
Point of law: Exclusion or inclusion of the names in the voters list does not warrant interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and such questions are to be decided in....
Point of law: Where the Government or any authority passes an order which is contrary to rules or law it becomes amenable to correction by the courts in exercise of writ jurisdiction
Interference in electoral matters after results are declared is barred by Articles 243-O and 243-ZG; the appropriate recourse is through an election petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.