Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Purnendu Singh
Angad Kumar Singh S/o Rameshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Health – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and background information (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. grounds for the review petition (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. maintaining the integrity of election processes (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. criteria for review petition admissibility (Para 12 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. supervisory role of higher governing bodies (Para 19 , 22) |
| 6. limits of judicial intervention in election matters (Para 30 , 42) |
| 7. conclusion regarding election process and next steps (Para 35 , 50 , 51) |
| 8. final order of disposed review petitions (Para 57) |
JUDGMENT :
Purnendu Singh, J.
Heard Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel along with Mr. Mukesh Kant, Mr. Venkatesh Kirti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, learned AC to AAG 9 for the State.
2. The issue and ground of review involved in both the civil review is similar, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.
3. Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel along with Mukesh Kant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the Indian Red Cross Society has directed to convene a meeting of Managing Committee of Indian Red Cross Society, Bihar State Branch for conducting election of Chairman, Vi
The Indian Red Cross Society must adhere to statutory election procedures, and the High Court may only intervene in elections under exceptional circumstances, emphasizing the necessity of following t....
Court emphasizes that once the election process has commenced, judicial interference is limited, and eligibility for voting must comply with established rules within organizational frameworks.
A dispute arising among the members of a society registered under the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001, relating to the affairs of the society, is to be resolved through the mechanism provided u....
Point of law: Exclusion or inclusion of the names in the voters list does not warrant interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and such questions are to be decided in....
Point of law: Where the Government or any authority passes an order which is contrary to rules or law it becomes amenable to correction by the courts in exercise of writ jurisdiction
Interference in electoral matters after results are declared is barred by Articles 243-O and 243-ZG; the appropriate recourse is through an election petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
