IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Ranjit Kumar Son of Sri Raj Nandan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. order passed during inquiry by the bihar human rights commission. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legality of the commission's directions. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 3. discussion on the non-binding nature of commission's recommendations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
ALOK KUMAR SINHA, J.
Heard the parties.
2. The present writ application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 25.07.2014 passed by the learned Member of the Bihar Human Rights Commission, Patna (hereinafter for brevity referred to as the ‘Commission’) in File No.BHRC/Comp.676/12 (Ram Narayan Singh vs. Dr. Ranjit Kumar).
3. For better appreciation of the case, the operative portion of the impugned order dated 25.07.2014 (Annexure-1) passed by the Commission is quoted herein below for needful.
“4. Commission in its order dated 02nd June, 2014 directed the Health Deptt. to send response to the Commission's proposal to award compensation to the victim. Health deptt. was told to send response by 02nd July, 2014 after which final orders will be passed. No response has come from the Health Deptt. Dr. Ranjeet Kumar was also asked to explain/summit his defence to the Commission. He has done so but he has mi
The Human Rights Commission’s role is purely recommendatory; it cannot issue binding directions, such as prohibiting medical practice.
Human Rights Commission's recommendations binding but judicially reviewable; cannot direct compensation without inquiry evidence proving public servant negligence causing human rights violation via r....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes exceeded its jurisdiction and acted as an adjudicatory authority, which was beyond its powers. Th....
A quasi-judicial body must comply with principles of natural justice by providing a reasoned order and an opportunity for both parties to be heard before making a decision.
The Commission under the WBCE Act, 2017 can adjudicate on deficiencies in service related to medical qualifications and award compensation, separate from medical negligence claims.
The Sikkim State Commission for Women lacks the authority to adjudicate disputes, only able to receive complaints and recommend remedial measures.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.