SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1398

KHATIM REZA
Putul Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bimal Kumar Sah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : M/s Waliur Rahman, Rajesh Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha.

Khatim Reza, J.—Heard Mr. Waliur Rahman, learned counsel assisted by Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This Second Appeal has been preferred by the defendant-appellant against the judgment and decree dated 19.04.2017 passed in Title Appeal No. 85 of 2014 by the Court of the learned 1st Additional District Judge, Naugachia (Bhagalpur), whereby the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2014 passed in Title Suit No. 39 of 2008 by the learned Sub Judge 1st, Naugachia (Bhagalpur), has been reversed.

3. At the time of admission of the present appeal under Order XLI, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the following substantial question(s) of law were formulated for determination:—

“(I) Whether the judgment and decree of learned lower appellate court is legally sustainable in view of the fact that the plaintiff himself stated in his plaint that after unregistered agreement for sale dated 02.11.2007, also delivery the possession of suit land to him?

II. Whether the suit of the plaintiff is not hit by the provisions of Section 53-A of the TP Act and Section 17(1-A) of the Registration Act?

III. Whether unr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top