SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1471

ARUN KUMAR JHA
Kari Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Purnendu Keshav, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, APP.

Arun Kumar Jha, J.—The present appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction dated 10.02.2005 and order of sentence dated 11.02.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Darbhanga in Sessions Trial No. 186/1997 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that the informant recorded her statement to the effect that while she had been sleeping on the varandah of her house and her daughter had been sleeping inside, on 24/25-02-1996 about 1.00 A.M., the appellant Kari Yadav came and gagged her mouth and forcibly committed sexual intercourse with her. Some scuffle took place and she received injuries on both her legs. Hearing her muffled sound, her daughter woke up and raised alarm and Yogendra Yadav and Madan Yadav reached there and, thereafter, the appellant Kari Yadav fled away from the spot.

3. On the basis of the aforesaid statement of the informant, a formal FIR being Singhwara P.S. Case No. 15/1996 was instituted under Section 376 IPC. The p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top