Ravi Mahto vs State of Bihar - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 944

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 944

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
Ravi Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants : M/s Vindhya Keshri Kumar, Sr. Adv., Neeraj Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha.

Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J. – We have heard Mr. Vindhya Keshri Kumar, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant assisted by Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned Advocate and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The name of the informant, who is said to be the victim of the occurrence has been concealed in the present judgment and order of this Court and has been referred to as the informant (PW-6).

3. By the impugned judgment and order dated 05.12.2019/12.12.2019 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Samastipur in Sessions Trial No. 79 of 2021 arising out of Chakmeshi P.S. Case No. 97 of 2011, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:—

Appellant Number	Conviction under Section	Sentence
Appellant Number	Conviction under Section	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
1.	Section 376(2) (g) of the IPC	Imprisonment for ten years	25000/-	S.I. for three months
	Section 3(1) (xii) of the SC/ST Act	R.I. for two years	4000/-	S.I. for one month
	Section 324 of the IPC	R.I. for three months	5000/-	S.I. for one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Pat) 944

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGHRavi Mahto – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
Ravi Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent