SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1477

PURNENDU SINGH
Raj Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Bharti Kumari.
For the Opp. Parties : Mrs. Shaheen Begum, APP.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Ms. Bharti Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Shaheen Begum, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred the application under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 20.03.2020 in connection with G.O. Case No.837 of 2017, whereby cognizance has been taken by the learned ADJ-II cum Special Judge, Nawada under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 11.08.2017 at 01:30 AM at Integrated Check Post, Rajouli, Nawada, the bus bearing Registration No. BR-06PA/6651 en route from Ranchi to Raxaul was stopped by the Inspector (Excise), Nawada, and other excise officials and the SAP force. Upon proper search, a bag containing 6.75 litres of illicit liquor was recovered in front of the seat of the petitioner in the said bus and was seized.

4. Ms. Bharti Kumari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that on the date of lodging of the excise case, the petitioner was coming from Ranchi and he was on the way to Varanasi, for which leave granted to the petitioner has been brought on record by w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top