SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1057

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Ranjeet Kumar Singh, S/o. Madan Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Ramchandra Singh, APP

JUDGMENT :

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

At the outset, it is important to mention that this appeal was taken on board under the caption “For Orders” where initially prayer of bail and suspension of sentence under Section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C. was raised by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant but, after short argument, it is submitted that he is ready for final hearing of the appeal, which was not objected by learned APP and, therefore, this appeal is being finally heard under aforesaid caption.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant/convict under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) challenging the impugned judgment of conviction dated 02.05.2024 and order of sentence dated 04.05.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, Excise-2, Bhagalpur in Special Excise No.177 of 2021 arising out of Sabour (Gouradih) P.S. Case No.36 of 2021, whereby the concerned Trial Court has convicted the appellant/convict for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,2016 (for short ‘Excise Act’) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of Rs.1,00,000/-and in defa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top