SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Pat) 12

ANSHUMAN
Suresh Kumar Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Uma Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : M/s Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Adv., Ashutosh Kumar Pandey, Parth Gaurav, Swayamparaph, Shalini.
For the Respondent: None.

Dr. Anshuman, J.—The present appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 09.07.1987 and 22.07.1987 passed and prepared respectively in Title Appeal No. 33 of 1975 by Mr. P. L. Kaungari, 5th Addl. District Judge, Siwan, reversing and setting aside the judgment dated 11.08.1975 and decree dated 28.08.1975 passed and prepared respectively by Mr. Prem Narain Shukla, First Munsif, Siwan, in Title Suit No. 2 of 1966.

2. The original appellant No. 1 to 7 were the plaintiffs of the title suit in which respondent No. 1 to 6 of present appeal were defendants and after decree of the title suit No. 2 of 1966 in favour of the original plaintiffs, original respondent Nos. 1 to 3 preferred Title Appeal No. 33 of 1975 in which the original appellants of memo of second appeal were respondents first set and original defendant Nos. 4 to 6 were respondent second set. The said appeal was allowed. Thereafter, the original plaintiffs-respondents first set had preferred the present second appeal which was numbered as Second Appeal No. 331 of 1987. But with the span of time, parties died and at their place, heirs and legal representatives of the respective parties were subs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top