Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Sharwan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ses Ram (deceased) through LRs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. trial court findings and reasoning. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. substantial questions of law identified. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. appellants' arguments regarding the birth certificate evidence. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. consideration of the application for additional evidence. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 7. criteria for admitting additional evidence. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. discussion on admissibility of public documents. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. validity and probative value of birth certificate evidence. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 10. interpretation of section 50 of the indian evidence act. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. regarding non-identity proof through birth registration entries. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 12. conclusion on civil court jurisdiction under h.p. land revenue act. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 13. final judgment and order. (Para 42) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29.12.2005 passed by learned District Judge, Kullu, vide which the appeal filed by Ses Ram (original plaintiff) was allowed and the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jr. Division, Manali c
The admissibility of public documents requires corroborative evidence to establish claims of familial relationships; civil suits challenging property mutations remain maintainable under specific prov....
(1) Secondary evidence – Certified copy of a sale deed could be produced as secondary evidence of public document and could be produced in proof of contents of public document or part of public docum....
Appellate court cannot admit additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC absent due diligence proof or necessity for judgment; must record reasons; erroneous allowance despite negligence and delay....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the enabling power of the Appellate Court to allow additional evidence for any substantial cause and the need for such evidence to pronounce jud....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Order XLI Rule 27 of the CPC, the admissibility of documents as public documents under Section 74 of the Indi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
