SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1480

HARISH KUMAR
Pinki Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Gyan Shankar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Obaidullah.

HARISH KUMAR, J.

Heard Mr. Gyan Shankar, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Obaidullah, learned Advocate for the State.

2. By filing the present writ petition, the challenge is made to an order contained in memo no. 524 dated 24.01.2018 passed under the signature of the Joint Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of stoppage of four increment of salary with cumulative effect as also recovery of Rs. 2,48,517/- from the salary of the petitioner. It is further directed that for suspension period, except subsistence allowance, the petitioner shall not be entitled to any benefit.

3. Before proceeding in the matter a preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the counsel for the State that the petitioner has alternative efficacious remedy under Rule 28 of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 hereinafter referred to as Rules, 2005. However, the petitioner instead of availing that remedy, has approached this Court.

4. In response to the aforesaid contention learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that since the order impugned is in disregard to the principles o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top