SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1494

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ALOK KUMAR SINHA, J.
Santosh Kumar Son of Shri Ram Chandra Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10594 of 2017
Decided on : 17-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Sr. Advocate Mr. Akshat Kumar, Advocate Mr. Arpit Anand, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, Gp-17 Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate

Section 57A(6) of the Bihar State Universities Act is inapplicable to teachers appointed after the stipulated date; University must process such appointments fairly.

Headnote:(A) Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 - Section 57A - Non-approval of appointment - Petitioner sought to command the University to consider his appointment as Assistant Professor after passing his M.Sc. and qualifying national tests, while authorities relied on Section 57A(6) which is inapplicable to his case as he was appointed after 19.04.2007. (Paras 1, 6, 12, and 13)

(B) Constitutional Law - Articles 14 and 21 - The arbitrary inaction of the University in not considering the appellant’s case violated the principles of equality and right to livelihood. (Paras 3, 5, and 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, also a qualified lecturer, sought approval for an appointment against the sanctioned post at his college, after being recommended by various committees and without the University taking necessary actions.

Findings of Court:
The writ application was allowed, directing the University to process and approve the petitioner’s appointment.

Issues: Whether Section 57A(6) applies to the petitioner who was appointed after the cutoff date, and if the University properly acted on his appointment recommendation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that Section 57A(6) is limited to teachers appointed before 19.04.2007 and that the respondent's inaction was unjustified.

Result: Writ application allowed, directing the University to proceed with the appointment approval.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks appointment approval. (Para 2 , 3)
2. university's defense of action. (Para 4 , 5)
3. applicability of section 57a(6). (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. court finds no role for section 57a(6). (Para 10 , 12)
5. court directs university to approve appointment. (Para 11 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT :

ALOK KUMAR SINHA, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner in the present writ application has prayed for the grant of following reliefs:-

I) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities under the B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur (hereinafter referred to as "the University") to take steps towards placing the matter of appointment of the petitioner against the third sanctioned post of Assistant Professor in Physics at Ramshreshtha Singh College, Chochahan, P.O.-Aniruddha Belsar, District-Muzaffarpur (hereinafter referred to as "the College") before the statutory Approval, Seniority and Pay Fixation Committee of the University as well as the Syndicate of the University for its approval;

(ii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities under the University to consider the matter of the appointment of the petitioner in terms of the provisions contained under section 57A of the BIHAR STATE UNIVERSITIES ACT , 1976 and approve the same in accordance with law;

(iii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities under the College to extend all the consequential benefits in favour of the petitioner after approval of his appointment by the statutory Approval, Seniority and Pay Fixation Committee as well as the Syndicate of the University, (iv) Any other relief/reliefs that the petitioner may be found to be entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the present case.

3. The case of the petitioner, inter alia, is as follows:-

i) 05.10.2007:- By order dated 05.07.2007 issued by the concerned authorities under the college, the petitioner was informed with respect to his appointment against the post of ‘Laboratory In-charge’ in the Department of Physics at the college and was, as such, directed to submit his joining against the said post within a period of one week from the date of receipt of the said order, failing which the appointment of the petitioner was to be canceled.

ii) 06.10.2007:- The petitioner submitted his joining against the post of ‘Laboratory In-charge’ in the Department of Physics of the College on 06.10.2007, which was duly accepted by the concerned authorities and thereafter, the petitioner started discharging his duty against the said post, and in the meantime, the petitioner proceeded on leave after taking due permission from the concerned authorities at the college in order to pursue the course of post-graduation in Physics. After having passed the M.Sc. (Physics) examination conduced by the concerned authorities under the University, the petitioner once again submitted his joining in the services of the college.

iii) 02.03.2010:- Thereafter, an order dated 02.03.2010 (Annexure-1) was issued by the concerned authorities under the college, by which while indicating that there is an acute shortage of teacher in the subject of Physics at the college, the petitioner was promoted in the capacity of ‘Lecturer’ in Physics at the college. In furtherance of the directions contained under the order dated 02.03.2010, the petitioner assumed the charge of ‘Lecturer’ in Physics at the college on 03.03.2010 and started discharging duties in the said capacity in accordance with law.

(iv) 01.08.2010:- Subsequently, an order dated 01.08.2010 (Annexure-2) was issued by the concerned authorities at the college by which while indicating that the aforesaid order dated 02.03.2010 suffered from certain infirmities, the said order dated 02.03.2010 was withdrawn ab initio; and furthermore,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top