ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Reena Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.—Heard Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, learned senior counsel, aptly assisted by Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, learned Advocate, for the petitioners, Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Shristi Singh, learned Advocate, for the respondent nos.7 to 11, Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, learned Advocate, for the Mirza Ghalib College, Gaya, Mr. Sidhartha Prasad, learned Advocate, for the Magadh University and Mr. Prabhakar Jha, learned GA-27, for the State.
2. By filing the present petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners pray for the following relief/reliefs:—
(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the Advertisement published in the Hindi daily Hindustan dated 06/10/2019 issued by Secretary, Governing Body, Mirza Ghalib College, Gaya, whereby and whereunder it has been informed that the advertisement issued in March 2018 and for which interview were held in February 2019 and for which panel was prepared – have been cancelled by the Governing Body of the College, without specifying any reason as to what were the compelling circumstances which warranted cancellation of the entire selection process, in which petitio
Dhananjay Malik vs. State of Uttaranchal
Sajeesh Babu K. vs. N.K. Santhosh
Ramesh Chandra Shah vs. Anil Joshi
Sk. Md. Rafique vs. Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah
T.M.A. Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka
Ahmedabad St. Xaviers College Society vs. State of Gujarat
Calcutta Gas Company (Proprietary) Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal
Mani Subrat Jain vs. State of Haryana
Ghulam Qadir vs. Special Tribunal
Kerala Education Bill, 1957, Re vs.
State of Kerala vs. Very Rev. Mother Provincial
Frank Antohony Public School Employees' Association vs. Union of India
P.A. Inamdar vs. State of Maharashtra
Secretary, Malankara Syrian Catholic College vs. T. Jose
Sindhi Education Society vs. Chief Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi
Minority institutions have an absolute right to select their staff without interference from educational authorities, as protected under Article 30 of the Constitution.
UGC Regulations cannot interfere with the fundamental rights of minority institutions to administer their educational affairs, as mandated by Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
The rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice under Article 30 of the Constitution of India are subject to reasonable regulations that are necessary to....
The court held that the eligibility for consideration in teaching appointments is confined to those appointed before a specific cutoff date, and the petitioners, appointed later, do not qualify.
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
The State Government had the power to issue directions for the appointment of a selection committee for recruitment of staff members, and the University was bound to comply with such directions. The ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.