IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
AJIT KUMAR, J.
Chandravadan Prasad Singh Son of Late Ramsakal Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5650, 6290, 6684 of 2019 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5189 of 2020
Decided on : 16-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' employment claims and appointments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. details of petitioners' claims under government policies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. court's findings on recognition of service. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. implications of the impugned orders and entitlements. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. final directives for financial and pensionary benefits. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. conclusion and overall order of the court. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Sri. P.N.Shahi, Sr. Advocate, Sri Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Smt. Sudha Ambastha, Sri Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners and Sri. Jitendra Kumar Roy, SC-13 assisted by Sri Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13, Sri Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17, assisted by S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP- 17 and Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28, for the Respondents-State.
2. Pursuant to the Order dated 01.12.2023 & 04.01.2024 passed in CWJC No. 5650 of 2019, the other writ petitions being CWJC No. 6290 of 2019, CWJC No. 6684 of 2019 & CWJC No. 5189 of 2020 were made analogous and after completing the pleadings by allowing all the parties to submit their responses, the matter was finally heard on 16.09.2025, and after hearing the respective counsels for the writ petitioners as well as the Respondents, and accordingly, the above writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order as the issues involved in these cases originates from the common impugned order, while in CWJC No. 6290 of 2019, there is no decision taken by the respondents with regard to their absorption in the light of the Resolution of the Government issued through the Department of Education as contained in Memo No.-12/P1-18/90/98P dated 15.06.2018, while the stand of the respondents in the counter affidavit being common to that of the reasons assigned in the impugned orders, the subject matter of which is challenged in the other analogous writ petitions, referring to the cut-off date shown to be operating as a bar in deciding their case of absorption, this writ petition is also being adjudicated together with the other writ petitions referred hereinabove.
3. The writ petitions i.e., CWJC No. 5650 of 2019, CWJC No. 6684 of 2019 along with CWJC No. 5189 of 2020 have been filed for the relief(s) mentioned hereinbelow: -
(i) For setting aside the office order contained in memo no. 125P dated 24.08.18 issued by respondent no.2/4 with respect to petitioners wherein rejecting the claim of approval of service of petitioners on the post of teacher in Ram Karan Thakur Project Balika Uchha Vidyalaya, Imansarai, Patori, Samastipur, he has illegally, arbitrary recorded of fraud of the date of appointment of petitioners which is contrary to the records and unsustainable in the eye of law.
(ii) For directing the respondents to approve the service of petitioner with effect from 01.01.1989 alongwith consequential payment of arrear salary and up-to-date salary forthwith since arrear salary have already been paid to other three teaching and non-teaching employees of the school in question.
4. While, the Writ Petition CWJC No. 6290 of 2019 has been filed for the following relief(s):-
(1) For a direction to the respondents authorities, to absorb these petitioners on the post of Teacher serial No. 1 to 3 and Night Guard (S.No-4) in pursuant to the Resolution issued by the Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna bearing Memo No. 12/P1-18/90/98P dated 15.06.2018 (ANX-8) on the basis of order passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.6626-6675/2001.
(ii) For further direction to the concerned respondents authorities for payment of the salary since the date they are working on the said post.
(iii) For other consequential relief/reliefs as Hon’ble Court may deem fit proper in the ends of justice.
Submission on behalf of the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in CWJC No.- 5650 of 2019 .
5. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the District Level C


The court determined that teachers' non-recognition based on arbitrary cut-off dates was unlawful, emphasizing the need for adherence to prior judicial resolutions affirming their employment status a....
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
Teachers of a derecognized institution do not have a legal right to claim absorption in other schools; recognition cancellation eliminates enforceable employment rights.
Termination orders must be communicated to be effective; failure to do so renders them invalid, affirming the statutory rights of employees to their positions and benefits.
Long-term employees cannot be denied regularization based on non-sanctioned posts if their qualifications meet requirements, protecting natural justice principles under employment law.
The court established that teachers engaged in unrecognized classes can be regularized upon the recognition of the school, provided their appointments were bona fide.
Point of Law : It would show that Commissioner and Secretary on basis of inconsistencies as regards multiple dates of appointment recorded in different official records had rejected claim of Petition....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.