SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1554

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA 
AJIT KUMAR, J.
Chandravadan Prasad Singh Son of Late Ramsakal Singh - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna – Respondent 
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5650, 6290, 6684 of 2019 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5189 of 2020
Decided on : 16-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.N.Shahi, Sr. Adv Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv Smt. Sudha Ambastha, Adv. Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (SC13) Mr. Hitesh Suman, Mr. Kameshwar Kumar (GP17)
Mr. S.K. Ranjan, Smt.Binita Singh

The court determined that teachers' non-recognition based on arbitrary cut-off dates was unlawful, emphasizing the need for adherence to prior judicial resolutions affirming their employment status and rights.

Headnote:(A) Education Department Resolutions - Various Appointment Dates - Recognition of Teachers’ Services - The court ruled that the decisions made on 24.08.2018 regarding non-recognition of petitioners' services as teachers based on cut-off dates were impermissibly arbitrary and contrary to prior rulings. The petitioners were entitled to salary and financial benefits dating back to 01.01.1989 as their services had been duly acknowledged. (Paras 19-40).

(B) Principles of Natural Justice - The court emphasized that the respondents had failed to provide a fair hearing before rejecting the claims regarding the approval of services. (Paras 25-27).

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, formerly teachers at a specified school, challenged a government decision denying them approval of their services. They argued that their appointments were valid and seeking to be absorbed retroactively under a government resolution establishing their school as a project school effective from 01.01.1989.

Findings of Court:
Historical acknowledgment of their employment dates by the government contradicts the respondents' claims of forgery.

Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to recognition as teachers and payment of salaries notwithstanding the claimed cut-off date.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the petitioners' rights were violated due to the lack of adherence to principles of natural justice and arbitrary administrative action.

Result: The writ petitions were allowed, and the respondents were directed to pay the applicants all financial and pension benefits as determined by the prior resolution within four months.

Table of Content
1. petitioners' employment claims and appointments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. details of petitioners' claims under government policies. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. court's findings on recognition of service. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. implications of the impugned orders and entitlements. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. final directives for financial and pensionary benefits. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
6. conclusion and overall order of the court. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)

JUDGMENT :

AJIT KUMAR, J.

1. Heard Sri. P.N.Shahi, Sr. Advocate, Sri Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Smt. Sudha Ambastha, Sri Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates for the petitioners and Sri. Jitendra Kumar Roy, SC-13 assisted by Sri Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13, Sri Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17, assisted by S.K.Ranjan, AC to GP- 17 and Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28, for the Respondents-State.

2. Pursuant to the Order dated 01.12.2023 & 04.01.2024 passed in CWJC No. 5650 of 2019, the other writ petitions being CWJC No. 6290 of 2019, CWJC No. 6684 of 2019 & CWJC No. 5189 of 2020 were made analogous and after completing the pleadings by allowing all the parties to submit their responses, the matter was finally heard on 16.09.2025, and after hearing the respective counsels for the writ petitioners as well as the Respondents, and accordingly, the above writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order as the issues involved in these cases originates from the common impugned order, while in CWJC No. 6290 of 2019, there is no decision taken by the respondents with regard to their absorption in the light of the Resolution of the Government issued through the Department of Education as contained in Memo No.-12/P1-18/90/98P dated 15.06.2018, while the stand of the respondents in the counter affidavit being common to that of the reasons assigned in the impugned orders, the subject matter of which is challenged in the other analogous writ petitions, referring to the cut-off date shown to be operating as a bar in deciding their case of absorption, this writ petition is also being adjudicated together with the other writ petitions referred hereinabove.

3. The writ petitions i.e., CWJC No. 5650 of 2019, CWJC No. 6684 of 2019 along with CWJC No. 5189 of 2020 have been filed for the relief(s) mentioned hereinbelow: -

(i) For setting aside the office order contained in memo no. 125P dated 24.08.18 issued by respondent no.2/4 with respect to petitioners wherein rejecting the claim of approval of service of petitioners on the post of teacher in Ram Karan Thakur Project Balika Uchha Vidyalaya, Imansarai, Patori, Samastipur, he has illegally, arbitrary recorded of fraud of the date of appointment of petitioners which is contrary to the records and unsustainable in the eye of law.

(ii) For directing the respondents to approve the service of petitioner with effect from 01.01.1989 alongwith consequential payment of arrear salary and up-to-date salary forthwith since arrear salary have already been paid to other three teaching and non-teaching employees of the school in question.

4. While, the Writ Petition CWJC No. 6290 of 2019 has been filed for the following relief(s):-

(1) For a direction to the respondents authorities, to absorb these petitioners on the post of Teacher serial No. 1 to 3 and Night Guard (S.No-4) in pursuant to the Resolution issued by the Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna bearing Memo No. 12/P1-18/90/98P dated 15.06.2018 (ANX-8) on the basis of order passed by the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.6626-6675/2001.

(ii) For further direction to the concerned respondents authorities for payment of the salary since the date they are working on the said post.

(iii) For other consequential relief/reliefs as Hon’ble Court may deem fit proper in the ends of justice.

Submission on behalf of the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in CWJC No.- 5650 of 2019 .

5. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the District Level C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top