SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Pat) 102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.
Habibur Rahaman @ Habibur Rahman S/O Abdul Haqim – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar - Respondents
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1599 Of 2025
Decided On : 19-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Y.V. Giri, Senior Advocate Mr. Devashish Giri, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Advocate

Liberal approach for bail pending appeal in NDPS cases where substantial sentence (3.5/10 years) served, no antecedents, no exceptional circumstances, satisfying Section 37 and upholding Article 21.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 37 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 415 (2) and 430(1) – Constitution of India – Article 21 – Suspension of sentence and release on bail during pendency of appeal – In appropriate circumstances, particularly where prolonged incarceration is shown and there is no material suggesting misuse of liberty, rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act can be held satisfied for grant of bail during pendency of appeal – Where appellants have already undergone substantial period of custody (about 3½ years) out of fixed sentence of ten years and there is no likelihood of early hearing of appeal, Court may suspend sentence and grant bail during pendency of appeal – Denial of bail in cases where convict has undergone substantial portion of sentence and appeal is unlikely to be heard soon may amount to infringement of right to personal liberty under Article 21 of Constitution – Considering that appellants had already undergone incarceration of about three and a half years out of fixed sentence of ten years, had no criminal antecedent and that there was no likelihood of early hearing of appeal due to pendency of cases, continued detention would adversely affect right to personal liberty of appellants – Provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act stood satisfied in present case – Sentence suspended and appellants released on bail during pendency of appeal subject to deposit of 50% of the fine amount. (Paras 7, 8 and 9)

Table of Content
1. appeal against ndps conviction seeks bail suspension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

ORDER :

Heard learned senior counsel for the appellants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.

2-This appeal under Sections 415 (2) and 430(1) of B.N.S.S. has been preferred by the appellants namely Habibur Rahaman @ Habibur Rahman and Akramul Mia @ Ekramul Miyan against the judgment of conviction dated 06.01.2025 and order of sentence dated 10.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Purnea in NDPS Special Case No. 71 of 2022, CIS No. 71 of 2022 (arising out of Madya Nishedh Purnea P.S. Case No. 423 of 2022) registered under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 of the NDPS Act 1985 convicting and sentencing the appellants as under:-

(a) 10 year’s rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100000/- each for the offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S Act, 1985 and in default of payment of fine, 1 year’s additional simple imprisonment.

(b) 10 year’s rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 100000/- each for the offence under Section 25 of the N.D.P.S Act, 1985 and in default of payment of fine, 1 year’s additional simple imprisonment.

All the sentences are ordered to run concurrently.

3. The appellants have prayed for suspension of their sentence and release on bail during the pendency of this criminal appeal before this Court.

4-Brief facts of the case, which are required to be stated, are that on the written report of SI Sanjay Kumar (PW1), First Information Report was registered as Madya Nishedh PS Case No. 423/22. In the F.I.R. it is alleged inter-alia that on 28.8.2022, a police team comprising the informant, Inspector Vijay Kanth Thakur (PW2), Constable Bikku Kumar (PW3), and other officers was conducting vehicle checks at the Daalkola check post. During the vehicle checking, they intercepted a silver Toyota Innova (bearing Reg. No. WB79 3351) traveling from West Bengal to Purnea. Upon stopping, the three occupants, identified as Habibur Rahman (driver), Sujit Roy, and Ekramul Miyan, attempted to flee the scene but were immediately apprehended. Subsequently, in the presence of two independent witnesses, Md. Tamsir and Md. Halaaz, the police conducted a search of the vehicle and discovered a secret chamber containing 70 packets of Ganja wrapped in brown plastic. The total recovery weighed 123.219 kg. The contraband was sealed, and the vehicle (Engine No. 2KD9879882, Chassis No. MBJ11JY4007085671) was seized. The seizure list and arrest memos were duly executed and signed by the witnesses, leading to the accused being charged with illegal possession and transportation of Ganja.

5-The main substratum of argument of learned senior counsel for the appellants are as under:-

5.1- The appellants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

5.2- As per the prosecution case two persons namely Md. Tanwir and Md. Hafaaz have been shown to be an independent witnesses of search of vehicle, recovery of ganja in question on 28.08.2022 and they are witness of seizure list but they have not been produced by the prosecution before the Trial Court and no reason has been given by the prosecution for not producing those independent witnesses, which creates serious doubt on the prosecution case.

5.3- Even during investigation, the statement of both the independent witnesses was not recorded.

5.4- Seizure of alleged Ganja was made on 28.08.2022, but no sampling was done at the spot.

5.5-The accused persons along-seized Ganja and vehicle were produced before the Court of Special Judge (NDPS Act), Purnia on 29.08.2022 but on that also no sampling was done.

5.6-The application for sampling and certification of Ganja in question as well as application for confiscation of vehicle was given to the concerned Court on 09.09.2022 but the sampling and certification under Section 52A of the NDPS Act was done after unreasonable delay on 05.11.2022. The vehicle was directed to be kept in malkhana.

5.7-It is alleged that whol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top