Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PURNENDU SINGH
Sumeshwar Prasad, son of Kapileshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PURNENDU SINGH, J.
Heard Mr. Abhinay Raj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Arif Daula Siddiqui, learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought, inter alia, following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-
“1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing of order contained in Memo No. 130 dated 24.02.2020 issued by the Deputy Collector, Hilsa, Nalanda, whereby the application of the petitioner for conversion of his land from agricultural to non-agricultural use has been rejected. A further direction be issued calling upon the respondent to bring on record the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Hilsa, as referred to in the Memo No. 130 dated 24.02.2020 and the same be quashed.”
3. Mr. Abhinay Raj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had made an application under Section 5 of the Bihar Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agriculture Purposes) Act, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2010”) in requisite Form No.3 giving all the details before the competent authority notified unde
Unregistered agreements to sell do not create vested rights for land conversion under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956.
The availability of an alternative efficacious remedy under the relevant Act and the inability of the High Court to adjudicate disputed questions of facts in a writ petition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
