Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PARTHA SARTHY
Girish Chandra Kumar son of Late Subodh Chandra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PARTHA SARTHY, J.
1. Heard Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s) :-
“1. (i) For issuance of an appropriate direction, order or writ in the nature of 'certiorari' quashing the memo no. 314 dated 10.03.2011 and its consequential order as contained in memo no. 992 dated 20.03.2011 by which the petitioner was dismissed from service on nonest and non-existent ground in utter disregard to the order dated 19.05.2008 passed in L.P.A. No. 200 of 2008 and for further quashing the order dated 24.06.2014 as well as the order dated 11.08.2016 by which the appeal and the memorial respectively filed by this petitioner have been rejected in most arbitrary manner and complete non- application of mind by the respondents concerned.
(ii) For commanding the respondents to pay retiral dues of the petitioner i.e. pension, gratuity, leave encashment, insurance etc. including salary of the petitioner for the period from 01.02.2011 to 25.07.2011 which is due to be paid to the petitioner.
(iii) For further holding and declaring
The court established that discrepancies in personal information provided during the appointment process can justify dismissal from service, and that the High Court's role is limited to reviewing the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
