SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Pat) 287

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ARUN KUMAR JHA, J.
Kaushik Singh @ Santosh Singh, Son of Musafir Singh - Petitioner
Versus 
The State of Bihar, through the Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.374 of 2022 with Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 343 of 2022
Decided On : 30-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 226 – Criminal Writ Jurisdiction – Against a judicial order no writ petition is maintainable under Article 226 of Constitution of India – Under Criminal Writ Jurisdiction, claim of compensation cannot not be assessed or considered – Grant of compensation would be an ancillary relief and if main relief goes, there would be no scope for grant of any ancillary relief. (Paras 17, 18 and 19)

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 72, 82 and 83 – Arrest warrant and Proclamation – Warrant of arrest cannot be issued on asking of police authority – Such warrant can be issued only to ensure presence of accused before court and it cannot be in aid of police investigation or to make such person join investigation – Though Court has power under Section 73 CrPC to issue warrant, it is only for the purposes of securing appearance before court and not before police – Power to secure warrant or issue warrant of arrest under Section 73 CrPC cannot be used solely for production of accused before police in aid of investigation – Proclamation issued under Section 82 of CrPC has also to satisfy condition that court publishing proclamation required accused to appear at a specified place and specified time not less than 30 days from date of publishing such proclamation – If statute provides for doing a thing in certain manner, it is to be done in that manner only or not all at all – Simultaneous order for issuance of warrant, proclamation and attachment under Sections 73, 82 and 83 of CrPC, respectively in a composite manner, is bad in eyes of law. (Paras 21, 22 and 23)

JUDGMENT :

Arun Kumar Jha, J.

Both the writ petitions arise out of orders passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Benipatti in G.R. No. 200 of 2021 in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 67 of 2021 and hence, both the petitions have been taken up together for disposal.

02. Criminal Writ Petition No. 343 of 2022 has been filed for quashing of the order dated 06.04.2021 passed in G.R. No. 200 of 2021 by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Benipatti against the petitioner and others ordering for issuance of warrant, proclamation and attachment of properties of the petitioner in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 67 of 2021, dated 29.03.2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

03. Criminal Writ Petition No. 374 of 2022 has been filed for quashing of the order dated 01.04.2021 passed in G.R. No. 200 of 2021 by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Benipatti against the petitioner and others ordering for issuance of warrant, proclamation and attachment of properties of the petitioner in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 67 of 2021, dated 29.03.2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

04. Briefly stated, the facts of the case, as could be culled out from the record, are that Benipatti P.S. Case No. 67 of 2021 was instituted on the basis of fardbeyan of informant Ram Narayan Singh for an occurrence which took place at around 1.00 PM on 29.03.2021. In the fardbeyan, the informant stated about hearing gun shot and commotion nearby his place and when he reached the place he found the petitioners as well as a number of co-accused persons, who were variously armed with firearms and other weapons and they assaulted the son and nephews of the informant killing them on the spot and seriously injuring three family members of the informant. The petitioners and 25 other persons have been named as assailants. It further transpires that subsequently two other injured persons succumbed to their injuries during treatment. Altogether 35 persons have been named in the FIR along with 10-12 unknown persons. Thus, FIR was instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 307, 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It further transpires from the record that the police filed requisitions before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- I, Benipatti on 31.03.2021 and 06.04.2021, respectively for issuance of warrant, proclamation and attachment of property of the petitioners under the provisions of Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter the ‘CrPC’). Acting upon the requisitions, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Benipatti allowed the requisitions and ordered for issuance of arrest warrant, proclamation and warrant for attachment simultaneously. These orders are under challenge before this Court.

05. Learned senior counsel, Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the impugned orders are completely illegal. Learned senior counsel further submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of their political rivals. They have no involvement in the whole occurrence. Petitioner Musafir Singh is an old person aged 82 years, who had been sleeping in his house when the occurrence is stated to have taken place. Petitioner Kaushik Singh @ Santosh Singh is son of petitioner Musafir Singh. The allegation against the petitioners and even other co-accused persons is not believable for the reason that the occurrence took place on the day of festival of Holi and being covered with colour and mud, identity of the any person, that too, from 100-500 meters was simply not believable. But informant named the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top