SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 177

P.N.MUKHERJEE
PULIN BEHARI SHAW – Appellant
Versus
MISS LILA DEY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL CHANDRA GUPTA, D.N.KUMAR, Hirendra Chunder Ghosh, NARENDRA NATH CHAUDHARY, SEN GUPTA, Soumendra Nath Mukherjee

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS Second Appeal is directed against an appellate decree of ejectment from a shoproom in the groundfloor of a certain building at Strand Bank Road. The defendant was a monthly tenant under the plaintiff in respect of the said shop room at a rental of Rs. 130/3/6 per month. The trial Court dismissed the suit but, on appeal, it has been decreed. Hence this Second Appeal by the unsuccessful defendant.

( 2 ) THE property originally belonged to the plaintiff's brother Amulya Kanjan Dey, under whom the defendant occupied the suit premises as the tenant. The dispute between the parties, namely, the plaintiff and the defendant and between Amulya and) the defendant, started a long time back and there were various proceedings, but, for my present purpose, it is sufficient to refer to the following facts:

( 3 ) ON 12-8-1949 Amulya sold the suit premises to the plaintiff. The defendant was then depositing rents with the Bent Controller in the name of Amulya because of disputes with him. On 18-3-1950 Amulya wrote to the defendant intimating the transfer and asking him to pay damages thereafter to the vendee, the present plaintiff. A letter of confirmation also foll









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top