SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 73

SHARMA, M.M.DUTT
SUMITRA DEVI AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
SULEKHA KUNDU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAR NATH BANERJEE, Asoke Lahiry, BANKIM CHANDRA DUTT, K.B.KANJILAL

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff and it is directed against the order dated October 1, 1975 of the learned Judge, 8th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta, dismissing the plaintiff's application for recording a compromise in adjustment of the suit under Order 23, Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THE suit was instituted by the plaintiff for specific performance of a contract of lease dated November 2, 1973, for khas possession of the suit premises and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from letting out the suit premises to any person other than the plaintiff. The suit premises is the first floor of premises No. 310, Rabindra Sarani, Calcutta. It is not, disputed that the defendant No. 1 Sm. Sulekha Kundu is the owner of the said premises. The defendant No. 2 Kestodas Kundu is the husband's elder brother of Sulekha Kundu. The plaintiff's cape is that on November 2, 1973, she entered into a contract of lease of the suit premises with the defendants on certain terms and conditions. Pursuant to the said agreement, the plaintiff advanced to the defendant No. 2 as the agent of the defendant No. 1, a total sum of Rs. 16,000





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top