A.K.SENGUPTA, K.M.YUSUF
BRIJMOHANLAL RATHI – Appellant
Versus
GITA DEVI RATHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26/08/1988 passed by the learned single Judge on an application of the respondents/defendants under O. VII, R. 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, inter alia praying for revocation of the leave granted under Cl. 12 of the Letters Patent. By the said judgment and order, the learned single Judge allowed the application of the respondents and dismissed the suit on the ground that it was a suit for land, which is situate beyond the jurisdiction of this Court.
( 2 ) TO appreciate the contentions raised in this appeal, it is necessary to summarise the case made out by the plaintiff in the plaint. According to the plaintiff, he was a partner along with some other defendants and one Ganeshlal Rathi of a partnership-firm named Venkatesh Steel Co. Out of the funds of the firm a building and land was purchased at 7 Hanuman Road, New Delhi for and on behalf and account of the said firm. Although the said premises stood and stands registered in the name of Ganeshlal Rathi (since deceased), the said premises were and are in fact an asset of the firm. The firm was dissolved by a deed of dissolution. Under the
REFERRED TO : Mithilesh Kumari v. Prem Behari Khare
Raj Kumar Singhania v. Benoy Kumar Mazumdar
Dhiraj Bala Kania v. Jethia Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal
United Commercial Bank v. Sanatan Bastu Shilpa Pratisthan
Hindusthan Gas and Industries Ltd. v. Adhish Chandra Sinha
Ratan Lal Sharma v. Purushottam Harit
Prem Ballabh Khulbe v. Mathura Datt Bhatt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.